When setting out to direct his first narrative feature, filmmaker Joshua Z Weinstein certainly didn’t make it easy on himself. A well-regarded director and cinematographer with a rash of commercial and documentary credits to his name, Weinstein decided to set his first fiction film, “Menashe,” within New York’s Hasidic community in Borough Park, Brooklyn. The neighborhood’s ultra-Orthodox Jewish population isn’t exactly known for being hospitable to outside secular interlopers.
And if that obstacle weren’t enough, Weinstein also cast real Hasidim rather than actors, many of whom had never seen a movie before, let alone been inside a cinema. As well, he chose to shoot “Menashe” entirely in Yiddish, a Germanic-based language spoken by the Ashkenazi Jews of Central Europe which dates back to the 9th century, and one Weinstein is not at all fluent in. Indeed, “Menashe” is the first film in almost 70 years to be filmed entirely in Yiddish.
Foregoing Yiddish would have been practical for a multitude of reasons, but not for a documentarian such as Weinstein. “This film lives or dies by its authenticity,” he said during a recent interview to promote the film’s release in North American cinemas.
This authenticity included loosely basing the story of the movie on the real life events of Menashe Lustig, whom Weinstein cast in the title role. The narrative focuses on Menashe, a grocery store clerk who wishes to maintain custody of his son Rieven after the death of his wife. Because Hasidic tradition mandates that every home with a child must have a mother, Menashe must remarry in order to reunite with his son. Without a new wife, Reiven must be adopted by his tradition-bound uncle. However, in the week leading up to his wife’s memorial service, Menashe’s Rabbi allows his son to live with him in an attempt to remove any doubt Menashe can be a good father.
Weinstein elevates what could easily have been a touching father and son bonding story and enhances it by layering in elements that take us inside New York’s Hasidic neighborhoods. This is a community that, though right in the middle of New York City, is rarely visited by non-Hasidic. In fact, finding locations in Borough Park and Crown Heights proved difficult because residents feared publicity that might be generated by a film production. To Hasidim, publicity goes against the traditional practice of modesty.
For this same reason, casting Hasidim was a challenge. While many people might clamor to appear in a movie, that is not the case for Hasidic Jews. At times Weinstein and his producer, Alex Lipschultz, would cast a role, only to have the performer drop out after being pressured by their synagogue, family or others within the community. Weinstein and Lipschultz were constantly anxious that those cast in “Menashe” remain committed throughout the production of the film.
Casting Hasidim however, meant that Weinstein would be able to shoot his film with natural Yiddish speakers, even if he didn’t understand what they were saying. In order for Weinstein to direct each scene, it would first be rehearsed with the actors in English. This allowed for blocking and performances to be worked out in a manner everyone could understand.
This included Yiddish translators that were constantly on set. “The translotors were the final roadblock to make sure things were correct,” said Weinstein. “Then when we switched to Yiddish, my Yiddish was basic enough that I knew approximately what was happening.”
Also helping refine performances and make sure they didn’t stray too far from Weinstein’s intent were the translators and Lipschultz, who not only produced “Menashe”, but co-wrote the screenplay. What allowed the filmmakers to work in this manner was a simplified technique they came up with to shoot and edit the film in Yiddish.
“It was kind of like the United Nations where we had on set, at all times, a live translator who was speaking into a microphone and was live translating everything that was being said, that was married to the video,” Weinstein explained. “So you could always turn on channel five when you were editing and you could hear exactly, word-by-word translation of what was being said. I’m not saying it was quick, because I think everything took us four to five times longer working in Yiddish, but that was the sacrifice we wanted to make for authenticity.”
As “Menashe” was being edited, Weinstein and his team would have Yiddish translators and scholars watch each cut to ensure every edit made sense. “We constantly had translators working with us throughout the entire process,” said Weisntein. “And then once we locked it we had many different Yiddish experts both inside the community and outside the community go through it and make sure we were getting it right.”
Part of the complication of working in Yiddish, especially when it came to creating subtitles, is that it is such a varied language. Much like the variations of Portuguese between Portugal and Brazil, Yiddish has countless versions that can differ immensely between neighborhoods, communities and countries. There can be a dozen different ways to say a single English word in Yiddish.
“Doing the subtitles for this film was so time consuming and exhausting. I probably wasted a month of my life or more just on subtitling this movie,” Weinstein confessed. “Yiddish is a language where there are so many different interpretations of it. I was always more interested in translating literally versus translating figuratively. If someone means ‘get lost’ but really the expression is ‘breaking a tea kettle,’ I want breaking a tea kettle and not get lost even though you’re figuratively saying get lost.”
But wouldn’t audiences get confused if they could understand the words being said in Yiddish, but not their ultimate meaning? “That’s why we had lots of debates about this,” Weinstein answered when asked directly. “The question was, who is our audience? I think our audience is really intelligent people who want to learn something new about society. Part of that is the language. We learn about society through what they say. Metaphors that societies use teach us a lot. It was always a big debate about how much do we let things stay not understood.”
Weinstein overcame the language barrier so adeptly in “Menashe” that the film was selected to premiere in the Next section at the 2017 Sundance Film Festival in January where it promptly won critical praise. One month later, the movie received a similar welcome at the Berlinale. A24 promptly came calling and picked up the rights for the film in the United States and China, making “Menashe” the upstart distributor’s first foreign language feature.
A24 is now opening the film theatrically in the United States starting July 28, 2017. Weinstein also reports rights to “Menashe” quickly sold in almost every territory around the world, giving the film a great opportunity to garner a large audience in cinemas.
One group that is unlikely to see “Menashe” in movie theatres is Hasidic Jews whose community is so vividly and respectfully depicted in the film. “They’re going to see it, they’re just going to bootleg it,” said Weinstein. “They are happy to pay for it. It’s just that most Hasidic people would not pay to go to see this movie in a theatre because it breaks a lot of the modesty codes that they have.”
Latest posts by J. Sperling Reich (see all)
- All About AMC’s New Subscription Program and What it Means for the Cinema Industry - June 20, 2018
- CJ Interview: Qube Cinema’s Rajesh Ramachandran On The Past, Present and Future of Qube Wire - June 9, 2018
- “Black Panther” Continues Its Winning Ways at an Ever Growing Golden Trailer Awards - June 5, 2018