Before we jump into this week’s editorial, I’d like to take a moment for a little self promotion.
First, our managing editor Helen Budge will be attending the 2024 Norwegian Cinema Conference being organized by Film & Kino in Lillehammer, Norway from 4-7 November to give a presentation on her well received editorial series, CJ People.
Secondly, on 7 November, our special guest on the CJ Cinema Summit will be Tony Chambers, Executive Vice President and Head of Theatrical Distribution at The Walt Disney Studios Company. As well, Dimitrios Mitsinikos, CEO of Gower Street Analytics will provide us with some insight into what audiences and exhibitors can look forward to for the remainder of 2024 and into next year. Christie and CINITY will be sponsoring the session (not to mention the very newsletter you are now reading). Register here.
Now, onto a subject that over the past two weeks has been generating a lot of conversation around industry-centric Los Angeles, as well as a lot of ink in trade publications and mainstream media; the definition and relevance of a theatrical release for a movie. The discussion revolves around two different movies at opposite ends of completion, both of which are being handled by Warner Bros.
The first is Clint Eastwood’s latest film “Juror #2” which, after premiering to generally positive reviews at the AFI Fest last weekend, began a limited theatrical distribution strategy. The movie is getting an extremely limited theatrical release in the United States, playing in fewer than 50 cinemas. This is in stark contrast to the film’s wider release in other countries like the United Kingdom, where it’s showing in over 300 theaters. In addition, Warner Bros. has made the unusual decision not to disclose box office earnings for “Juror #2” and the film is conspicuously absent from the studio’s “For Your Consideration” awards website.
“Juror #2,” which stars Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette and Zoey Deutch, is a courtroom drama that was originally produced as a streaming release. Apparently, after the film tested well with audiences, Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy, the co-chairs and CEOs of Warner Bros. Pictures Group, decided to give Eastwood’s film a theatrical run. Even so, there seems to be very little, if any, traditional marketing in support of “Juror #2,” which is perceived to be the 94-year-old Eastwood’s last film.
This raised questions about why Warner Bros. has such a limited distribution plan for the movie, with widespread industry speculation pointing towards Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav being behind the move, as he had been critical of of green-lighting Eastwood’s films based on their long-standing relationship rather than quality. Something about it being called “show business” not “show friends.” There is no proof that Zaslav had anything to do with planning the theatrical run of “Juror #2,” though the whole situation generated a debate over what constitutes a true theatrical release. The jury is still out on that one and has been for several years. A verdict seems a long way off.
In the same moment that Warner Bros. is being criticized for throttling the theatrical distribution of “Juror #2,” the studio is winning bidding wars for high profile projects with A-list talent in large part because they promise a traditional theatrical release. More impressively, they are doing so by offering to pay far less than other bidders.
When Emerald Fennell, known for directing edgy films like “Promising Young Woman” and “Saltburn,” announced she will be directing an adaptation of Emily Brontë’s classic novel “Wuthering Heights” as her next project, there was plenty of interest. Once Margot Robbie signed on to play the main character, Catherine Earnshaw, and Jacob Elordi was cast as Heathcliff, Fennell had her pick of studios and streaming services to work.
Though Netflix offered to pay USD $150 million to land the production, Fennell and Robbie, who is also producing the film through her LuckyChap production company, chose Warner Bros. which offered them a production budget of USD $80 million. To be sure, LuckyChap has a first-look deal with Warner Bros., however it was the willingness of the studio to provide the film with a theatrical release supported by a generous marketing campaign that sealed the deal.
Robbie has never starred in a streaming movie and it appears she doesn’t want to start now. Meanwhile, Fennell has had experience working for a streamer on “Saltburn,” which was distributed by Amazon Studios. Her gothic, modern spin on Evelyn Waugh’s “Brideshead Revisited” spent 30 days in theatres domestically, in the United Kingdom and Australia, before being sent to Amazon’s Prime streaming platform, where it was wildly popular. Still, Fennell seemingly wants “Wuthering Heights” to have a robust theatrical distribution, something she knew would be impossible with Netflix.
Ted Sarandos, Co-CEO and Chief Content Officer at Netflix confirmed this just a few days before Warner Bros. picked up Fennell’s project. “I’m just going to reiterate, we are in the subscription entertainment business,” he said during the company’s third quarter earnings call. “What we do for filmmakers is we bring them the biggest audience in the world for their films, and then we help them make the best films of their life. I’m sure that we can continue to pierce the zeitgeist and have those moments in the culture, even when those moments begin on Netflix.”
Ultimately it says a lot about the perceived value of a theatrical release that the same industry-insiders who are baffled by why Warner Bros. is “burying” a well reviewed title from a decorated filmmaker all agree Fennell and Robbie made the right choice in selling their their latest project to that same studio for 47% less than Netflix.
Sponsor Spotlight
See it, feel it, live it in CINITY
Filmmakers such as Ang Lee and James Cameron have already expressed their appreciation for CINITY, a brand-new cinema format. Now you can learn how the most advanced cinema projection system looks on your premium large format screen with brighter images, 3 times higher contrast, 5 times the normal frame rate, and 34% more color in 3D or 2D.
Celluloid Junkie is the leading online resource dedicated to the global film and cinema business. The Marquee is our newsletter focused on motion picture exhibition; keeping industry professionals informed of important news, the latest trends and insightful analysis