Tag Archives: Box Office

Box Office Review-Sunday 10 May


The Star Trek franchise had its biggest opening yet, as Paramount’s relaunched “Star Trek” topped the North American box office this weekend with an estimated $72.5 million, giving the film a domestic total of $76.5 million (with its Thursday opening night).

“X-Men Origins: Wolverine”—which last week had the biggest opening weekend of the year so far with an $85 million debut–finished in second place with an estimated $27 million, bringing its domestic box office total to $129.6 million. Worldwide, the film has crossed the $200 million mark.

Dreamworks Animation’s first digital 3D release “Monsters versus Aliens” stayed in the top 10 in its seventh week, bringing in an additional $3.4 million as its domestic total climbed to an estimated $186.9 million and worldwide gross reached $329.9 million. The production budget for “Monsters”—still the top grossing film of the year so far–is estimated to be around $175 million.

DWA still has a few more weeks before the next wide digital 3D release, Disney/Pixar’s “Up,” opens in theaters on May 29.

After a disappointing start last week, Lionsgate’s animated 3D release “Battle for Terra” continued to struggle. This weekend it brought in an estimated $184,000 for a $1. 5 million total domestic gross.

Add two more 3D release dates to your lists: Warner Bros.’ “Happy Feet 2”—the sequel to the computer animated Oscar winner “Happy Feet”—is slated to open in 3D on Nov. 18, 2011. Meanwhile Vivendi will open the live action family adventure “Call of the Wild 3D” next month on June 12.

Popularity: 38% [?]

Booming U.S. Box Office Makes Headlines

John Fithian of NATO

John Fithian of NATO

These days, with the global economic crisis at full force dominating headlines, it seems mainstream media will jump on anything that even smells like positive news.  So, it’s no wonder with North American box office earning a billion dollars in January and an additional US $800 million in February that media outlets would break their tradition of only covering box office grosses on Monday mornings in favor of feature stories about how moviegoers have returned to theatres.

A spate of articles in various publications was kicked off on February 25th by Andreas Fuchs’ Film Journal piece in which John Fithian, president of the National Association of Theatre Owners (NATO), holds forth in a “state of the industry” interview.  A good portion of the lengthy piece is devoted to the current state of the digital cinema transition, which Fithian still believes will heat up in 2009 despite any financial woes.  Fithian then goes on to describe the exhibition industry as being “recession-resilient” though stopped short of calling it “recession-proof”:

“The cinema is a relatively inexpensive way to be entertained. If people don’t have money to go on a big vacation, they take a mini-holiday at their local movie theatre. So the environment of challenging times is generally good for us, but that doesn’t mean it always works. You need to have good movies. People are not going to escape the burdens of the day by going to see a bad film.”

While U.S. box office set an all time record in 2008 with US $9.79 billion in grosses, Fithian points out that admissions were actually down 2.5% Read More »

Popularity: 36% [?]

Trades Tackle Box Office Reporting Day-By-Day


Hollywood Reporter LogoThere are some who believe that Hollywood movies began a long decline when the industry started relying on a film’s opening weekend box office for a large chunk of its ultimate gross.  They argue that as mainstream media began to report box office figures, who came in first over a given weekend became more important than whether the films were actually worth watching.  So those who fall into this camp will be particularly dismayed to learn that Hollywood trade papers are now reporting on box office figures mid-weekend.

Not that this is anything new, since 2007 Variety has been posting stories to their website on Saturday that detail the previous day’s North American box office figures.  Now, in an attempt to keep up with their competition, The Hollywood Reporter seems to be taking up the practice.  I was a little surprised to receive an email from the reporter on Saturday informing me that “Madea locks up top b.o. spot Friday”.         Curious to know why this was such breaking news I clicked through to read the story which was simply a rundown of Friday’s  top ten grossing box office films.  It was filled with such hedging wording as “. . .on track to rack up a three-day number. . .”, “. . .should set an opening weekend record. . .” and “In what’s shaping up as another busy weekend at the multiplex. . .”.

Given that the trades only publish their paper editions on weekdays, the mid-weekend box office reports are only posted online.  I put in a call to a couple of friends who work with both trades to see what their thinking was.  Read More »

Popularity: 22% [?]

Lionsgate Goes Mobile With Webalo

Example of box office figures delivered via Webalo

Example of box office figures delivered via Webalo

While it may not be the Hollywood-way, I’m always glad to hear about a longtime friends’ success.  That’s one way of saying I need to offer a full disclosure for this post.  You see, Rob Edenzon has been an acquaintance for ten years now, since joining the board of directors at FilmStew, a web startup I helped found before the dot com bubble burst.  Now Rob is the vice president of sales at Webalo, a technology company that helps format and deliver software applications and enterprise business data to mobile devices.

For some time now Rob has been telling me about Webalo’s contract with specific television networks to deliver detailed overnight Nielsen rating spreadsheets to their employee’s Blackberries, while at the same time expressing a desire to offer box office grosses to studio executives on their own mobile gadgets.  Well, his wishes came true on Wedensday as Webalo announced a deal with Lionsgate to deliver “live” box office figures to the smartphones of the studio’s top executives.  What’s interesting to me is that the box office figures are coming not from aggregators such as Nielsen EDI or Rentrak, but instead from Lionsgate’s own internal SAP systems.  Though, on second thought, the press release (warning: PDF) announcing the agreement didn’t say whether the box office figures were flash grosses or audited reports and if they are the former, then I wouldn’t be shocked if they were coming from an aggregator.

It must not have been hard to convince Lionsgate to try out the technology.  Webalo’s offering is pretty much a turnkey solution with a web interface that enables IT managers to quickly reformat reports for mobile phones (mostly Blackberries) on the fly.  Read More »

Popularity: 30% [?]

Billion Dollar Box Office Seems Recession Proof In January


Media By Numbers LogoAs the entire world continues to experience a global economic meltdown, those of us living in North America have apparently decided to throw some financial support behind one of our leading exports; movies.  Box office tracker Media By Numbers is reporting that January’s box office figures top out at USD $1.03 billion, up 19% from the January of last year when a measly USD $867.2 million was taken in.  This is the first time on record. . . or ever. . . that box office revenue has surpassed USD $1 billion in January.

These figures only account for movie tickets, not concessions sold in theatres, and of course there will be skeptics who claim that the price of a movie ticket rose from one year to the next which accounts for the revenue increase.  According to Media By Numbers however, the average price of a ticket only rose 1.5% from USD $7.18 to USD $7.29, while the number of tickets sold to moviegoers rose from 121 million in January of 2008 to 141 million this year.  That’s an increase of 16%.  Go figure, one of the few industries that can report an increase in revenue and customers in these troubled times is the movie business.

Read More »

Popularity: 20% [?]

Cinemas: “Recession? Bring it on!”


coffee recession

Recession is now a fact, but cinemas appear fairly nonplussed. Is this wishful thinking or actually born out by past experience? The UK’s The Guardian seems to think the latter, pointing out that box office takings rose in five out of the last seven recessions in the US:

“Hollywood gets bump from slump” was the trade bible Variety’s front-page headline, and industry analysts believe the relatively low cost of going to the cinema and the prospect of offering an escape from financial concerns for two hours will give cinema chains some resilience.

In Britain, box office revenues and cinema attendances continued to rise throughout the late 1980s and early 90s as the multiplex revolution swept through the country and going to see a movie again became a viable, low-cost leisure option for millions.

“Box office revenues definitely came up in the early 90s. As far as I can see there’s very little evidence to show cinema attendance suffers in a recession. If anything, it does quite well,” said David Hancock, head of film and cinema at Screen Digest.

This sentiment was echoed by the heads of both NATO and Regal cinemas in a recent interview in THR.com:

THR: Exhibition tends to be recession-resistant, but wouldn’t a spreading recession hurt concession sales?

Campbell: This is the most affordable out-of-home entertainment option that consumers have available, but at some point, do people stop buying concessions? I don’t think so. At some point, people may be a little more selective in some of their purchases, but at this point in time we haven’t seen that.

THR: Do hard times hurt smaller chains and mom-and-pop exhibitors more?

Fithian: I don’t believe there is a different impact on smaller chains in hard economic times. In fact, it is often the consumers in smaller markets who are most challenged during recessions. So they don’t take the vacation. Higher gas prices mean they don’t go for long drives to theme parks or other places. They stay closer to home, and when people stay closer to home, they tend to go to the cinema more often.

The optimism seems to be backed up by numbers from screen advertising in the US, again from THR.com:

CAC president and chairman Stu Ballatt predicted that the industry’s double-digit percentage growth path would continue “for the next few years at least.”

He said a sluggish U.S. economy does not seem to slow marketers’ willingness to put money into cinema promotions. For example, Ballatt cited increased activity across many sectors, with cinema ad spending by packaged goods and retail companies showing particularly strong growth during the past six to 12 months.

Cinemas and Hollywood are ‘fortunate’ in the sense that the past couple of years stagnation and even slump (once you look at actual attendance, as opposed to BO growth) could be blamed on poor films, whereas this summer’s crop has performed better - and this is before the fantastic Dark Knight opens (we’ve seen it and we know it is going to make Iron Man look like Tin Man when it comes to both critical and audience acclaim).

But there are those that doubt that cinemas will escape the brunt of the recession unscathed. Foremost amongst them The Guardian’s resident Hollywood contrarian Jon Patterson:

As for the benighted ticket-buyers, I wonder this time if they’ll display the same bovine sense of product loyalty the moguls depend on when times are tight. During the Depression, a movie ticket bought you a cartoon, a newsreel, a B feature and a marquee-topper - something like four hours of entertainment for a nickel (the price of a gallon of gas or a pack of smokes back then). A bargain if you needed to escape your troubles or just eat up dead unemployment time - and the movies were good enough that around 5bn tickets were sold between 1934 and Pearl Harbor. It was hard to feel Greatly Depressed when Astaire and Rogers, Gary Cooper, the Marx Brothers or Eddie Cantor were living it up on screen.

But things are different now, and films aren’t nearly the draw they were then. In 1938, the movies competed only with such distractions as booze, sex, God, the radio or political agitation; there was no streaming online video, no computer games, no 60in plasma TVs, no home-movie market whatsoever. If the economy collapsed tomorrow, would seeing Transformers 2 alleviate your misery or simply compound it? Dear viewer, you have options!

In the insurgent spirit of that turbulent decade, let’s call for a Netflix Revolution: we just stay home and watch as many movies as we like for 13 bucks a month. Those moguls could use a little sojourn in Hooverville - it might improve their movies, too.

Cineflix or Netflix - the choice is yours. Let’s see where the tally stands at the end of the summer.

Popularity: 57% [?]

Indian Box Office Is Booming


Thanks to lurid exposes like the one which appeared in the December 22nd issue of The Economist most westerners probably think of India as a crowded and impoverished country filled with 1.1 billion people living in slums and working for miniscule wages. What they might find hard to believe, despite Bollywood’s international reputation as a bustling film industry, is that Indian’s spend Rs 8000 crore, or $2 billion, per year going to see movies. According to “Cinemagoing India“, a report published by Dodona Research, a UK-based industry analyst, this figure is not only accurate, but bound to grow over the next several years.

And if that doesn’t convince you, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) hired PricewaterhouseCoopers to write a separate report which predicts that by 2011 the Indian film industry could be generating upwards of Rs 17,500 crore, or $4.4 billion. While this figure may not outpace yearly box office figures in the United States, the world’s highest grossing film industry, it still amounts to Rs 80, or $2, per capita in India. In a country where the average movie ticket price is under $1 and per capita income is $707, raking in that kind of dough is certainly an achievement. Read More »

Popularity: 24% [?]

Hollywood Rules India (For One Weekend)


Bollywood Hollywood

For one weekend out of 52, Indian cinemas look like those in almost every other non-US territory dominated by Hollywood films. There were no less than five studio titles opening this past Friday: I Am Legend, 30 Days of Nights, 1408, The Heartbreak Kid and Air Buddies, with just one Hindi film (Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train re-make Strangers), plus a last minute postponement of the release of Eastern Promises. While it shows a faltering grasp of the counter programming concept (vampire film, vampire/warewolf film, Stephen King adaptation and a narrowly avoided David Cronenberg film) it is the celluloid equivalent of saturation carpet bombing of Indian multiplexes with US films. The explanation is that no major ‘Bollywood’ releases are due for another week, when Aamir Khan’s much anticipated Taare Zameen Par (Every Child Is Special) opens, alongside mid-size title such as Welcome. So next week is back to normal.

But Hollywood films are slowly starting to grow in the Indian cinema market even though they are still to mainstream cinema, what non-English language films are in the US cinema market. An article in Time of India (Hollywood spins Rs 300 cr web in India - not web link) shows that films from the major US studios have crossed the 300 crore rupees threshold ($76m) compared to 241 crore last year, a significant leap, despite the number of titles released only going up from 74 to 76, i.e. three every two weeks. From the article:

The mood in Sony, Warner and UIP is therefore celebratory. According to trade guru Amod Mehra, Hollywood’s share in the cinema revenue pie in the country is still a nibble of barely 3 to 5%, but the fact that the Rs 300-crore mark has been crossed is reason enough to rejoice.

Proof of Hollywood’s growng appeal is reflected in the distribution pattern. Casino Royal was released with 427 prints in 2006, whil Spider-Man 3- the biggest ever hit in India so far - was released with 597 prints this year. In fact, big Hollywood films are now often released with 100-plus prints, a sign of growing demand.

Read More »

Popularity: 19% [?]

LA Times: ‘Golden Compass’ South of Blockbuster Status


‘Golden Compass’ One SheetIn their weekly box office prognositaction column today, Movie Projector, the Los Angeles Times is predicting that the holiday season’s first tent pole release, ‘The Golden Compass‘, will finish its opening weekend in less than blockbuster condition. They may not be far from wrong either; as of Friday RottenTomatoes.com, the film review aggregation website, lists the movie as only receiving 43% positive notices out of the 138 submitted by critics. According to the Times the film’s tracking hasn’t been all that great with moviegoers highly aware of the film but not all that interested to go see it.

That’s not exactly the plan New Line Cinema had in mind as they made the film and prepared it for release on some 3,528 screens in North America. The article quotes the studio’s president of domestic marketing, Chris Carlisle, as saying:

“From the very beginning we have been positioning this as a big-event movie in the same league with ‘The Chronicles of Narnia,’ ‘Lord of the Rings’ and ‘Harry Potter’.”

Like the films Carlislecites, ‘Golden Compass’ is a fantasy film based on British author Philip Pullman’s best selling, albeit controversial His Dark Materials trilogy. Starring Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig and first time actress Dakota Blue Richards, the film follows the story of a 12-year-old girl on her journey into a parallel universe where a battle between the forces of good and evil threatens the universe. One of the unique narrative devices found in both the book and the film adaptation is that all the main characters are accompanied by talking animals meant to represent their souls.

Read More »

Popularity: 10% [?]