ShoWest Opens With Michael Lynton Keynote

Michael Lynton at ShoWest 2010

Michael Lynton at ShoWest 2010

The 2010 edition of ShoWest, the annual gathering of theatre owners and distributors, kicked off in Las Vegas earlier today with a keynote address from Michael Lynton. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sony Pictures Entertainment had both junk and theatrical release windows on his mind, and not necessarily in that order.

After opening his remarks with some cheerleading over 2009′s record breaking box office returns, Lynton detailed why he believed the industry was doing so well in the midst of a deep recession:

“People battered by the recession see in movies reasonably priced escapism. It is the most affordable way to take a break, get out of the house, take the kids or get away from them and be transported to another world.”

Lynton pointed to the industry’s willingness and ability to change as being one of the prime factors for increased theatrical revenue over the past year. Despite economic, social and technologic challenges, he praised both exhibition and distribution’s willingness to find new ways to overcome challenges and prosper.

But Lynton wasn’t all smiles. He highlighted the increasing economic difficulties faced by studios this past year. At the height of the DVD boom in 2005 and 2006 57% of Sony’s revenues came from DVD rentals and another 43% came from DVD sell-through, but today, thanks in large part to the recession, that split is nearing a 75% – 25% split. Unlike sell-through where studios can earn USD $14 to USD $18 per disc, they only earn roughly USD $1 to USD $4 in rentals. The bottom line, according to Lynton, is a much narrower bottom line for the studios, which Sony has already begun adapting to:

“[We are] Being more targeted in our production and marketing spend and more fiscally responsible in our talent contracts and all the studios have had to make the difficult decision to lay off workers. We are reducing our work force by hundreds of positions this year alone. And that’s not just our problem, it’s your problem too, precisely because our fates are intertwined. You need our movies as much as we need your theatres. If our revenues keep going down than we can’t make as many movies.”

This naturally led into one of Lynton’s main talking points, the touch subject of theatrical release windows. While acknowledging that the most important release window for Sony is the theatrical window and reiterating that the studio makes movies to be seen in theatres, not on television, iPods or cell phones, Lynton explained that people want to see movies whenever and wherever is convenient for them. With that in mind, he told theatre owners in attendance:

“It is clear from the changing economic model of our industry that we are going to have to reevaluate the way in which the current window structure operates. And we need to do so, as in the case of digital cinema, by being candid and cooperative with each other so we can find a solution that works for everyone. . . we’ve all got to be open to experimenting with new and different windows, taking advantage of new and different technologies. As we do that we don’t want to open a new window in a way that closes yours. I believe there are responsible and responsive ways to provide audiences with entertainment that preserves the prominence and preeminence of the theatrical experience while allowing us to create an economic model that will allow your business and ours to prosper together. I believe we can and should work collaboratively to do just that as partners.”

Citing the growing epidemic of childhood obesity as, Lynton wrapped up his speech by urging exhibitors to add healthier snack options to their concession stands. He wasn’t suggesting items such as spinach, broccoli or, as he put it, a 40 ounce cup of prune juice, but rather fresh fruit, veggies with dip, trail mix and granola. After showing the audience a video taped message from Dr. Mehmet Oz, Lynton said:

“By bringing healthier snacks into your concession stands you would be helping our country meet an urgent public health need. Taking this step is also great audiences and for your business because people want to see healthier foods in theatres and when they do, they’ll buy them.”

However, just an hour or so later during a panel discussion which included five exhibitors from around the world, Lynton’s plea was countered with anecdotal evidence. During a panel titled Exhibition Speaks Out: New Challenges and Best Practices, theatre owners claimed moviegoers weren’t interested in healthy snacks when going to the movies. Tony Kerasotes of Kerasotes Theatres was the most blunt and humorous in speaking about the topic:

“Every two years the center for the study of no fun comes out with their popcorn report and then there’s a flurry of newspaper stories that one paper picks up after another and then it’s over and everybody goes back to the way they were. It’s just a bunchy of hooey. People want their fat content however they get it.”

Tom Stephenson of Rave Motion Pictures echoed Kerasotes’ sentiment, providing the following explanation:

“I think people give themselves a pass to come to the movies to eat exactly what they want, to drink exactly what they want and we should satisfy that demand.”

Popularity: 27% [?]

Related Posts

 
  • http://www.dcinematools.com/ intmarine

    Does anything prevent theaters from selling DVDs? Has it been ruled out that they could get early access to them when the window is set to their disadvantage? and at the Walmart price?

    Not all exhibitors slammed corporate responsibility at the New Challenges and Best Practices presentation. The first exhibitor to speak on the food issue mentioned that their group had studied and tested the popcorn issue long and hard and switched to a healthier oil for their popcorn throughout their chain.

    His comment didn’t get the cheers that Mr. Kerasotes’ comment got from the heavyset people around me. Unfortunately, the logical extension of the ‘satisfy demand-hooey’ argument is that safety standards and equipment can be eliminated since most people would choose a cheaper ticket than to go through all the bother of flame retardant materials and tested alarm systems. Perhaps if there were a Carrot Association giving promotional deals and insane profits like the cola companies do, things might be different.

  • http://www.showbizsandbox.com/ J. Sperling Reich

    I’ve always wondered whether selling DVDs in the theatre would work. Think about it – when you go to a Broadway show they sell you the score (along with t-shirts and mugs) for the very show you’re attending. Why couldn’t a cinema sell a movie ticket to see a film in the theatre, along with a DVD of the same film? Especially if the DVD was only sold with the purchase of a movie ticket?

    The most obvious reason is piracy. What is to prevent someone with lower moral standards than most of us from going home, ripping the DVD onto their computer and posting it on a bit-torrent site? In addition, such DVDs would likely be passed around between friends and family, which could lower the overall theatrical box office take. Not everyone who is given or loaned such a DVD would have seen the film in the theatre, but this scenario is probably most likely to be played out among teenagers. I’m sure I don’t need to tell anyone what percentage of the movie-going audiences that fill theatres are made up of teenagers.

    As for the gentleman on the New Challenges and Best Practices who mentioned his chain researched healthier popcorn choices and switched to a healthier version, that was Tom Stephenson of Rave. He had a “but” to his statement that said when they tried to switch to healthier popcorn patrons returned to concession stands and requested the old buttered version.

  • http://www.dcinematools.com/ intmarine

    I wasn’t thinking that the cinema would sell the DVD with the movie, but rather when the 14 week window opened to sell DVDs, that their patrons would get first crack.

    Perhaps the movie’s DVD would be sold a week in advance of when the regular store got the item, and if the patron brought in a stub (or receipt) that shows that they saw the movie during its first run, then they could get a good discount.

    The cinema would also have some type of ‘favorite nation’ terms such that they would get access to the DVD at the same (or better) price that the big discount chains get it.
    =-=-=-=
    As far as the healthier food debate goes, the problem isn’t butter, of course. Humans have had thousands of years to learn to assimilate it; that it requires some exercise to burn it off is a different topic of concern. But popcorn isn’t cooked in butter, and that topic is gets into arcane conversations about hydrogenated, saturated and trans-fats, as well as the problems of destroying animal habitats and rain forests in distant lands so that palm trees can be grown for oil in their stead.

    All that aside, the real problem is one of choice. One is prohibited from bringing food from home, but one is left with choices which are as coincidently grossly profitable as they are grossly unhealthy. Methinks that my grandmother and mother would both rush the stage and box my ears if I was so flippant about my customers health as what I heard the other day.

  • Gwendolyn Campbell Fadel

    I totally agree with most of the comments already posted. For a long time I’ve been touting the benefit of selling CD’s annd DVD’s via vending machines or cards along with shirts and hats in theater lobbies.
    It would also bring people to the theater that might not go to a movie otherwise. Gwen Campbell Fadel

  • Gwendolyn Campbell Fadel

    I agree with most of the comments posted before.
    I have long touted the benefits of not only selling DVDs and CDs in
    theater lobbies via vending machines or carts, shirts, hats and signed
    photos too. If not DVDs for the movie running DVDs for other hits and
    movies of interest and/or the music CD. In fact I have a few ideas to
    present to NATO re. the show next year.